Archive for October 4, 2006

Linked markets

The prediction market’s list has been abuzz with the apparent contradiction between intrade and newsfutures predictions on the U.S. congressional elections this year. Newsfutures is tracking a much much higher confidence that the Democrats will take over the house this year than intrade is. Several points have been brought up, such as differnce in polling question: intrade asks for bids for or against the proposition that Republicans will retain control of the house in 2006, Newsfutures offers markets with the propositions house democrats regain control or Republicans will retain control of the House of Representatives. The later question nearly matches intrade’s question word for word, but if newsfuture’s site is any indicator, people perfer to bid on The Democrats will regain control of the house and hence possibly never see the flip side of the market. This doesn’t mitigate the possibility of a biased question (one point brought up on the mailing list), but does show that when given the choice, people are preferring to take the question that allows them to bid positively on their choice instead of intrade which requires people who think the democrats will win to take the position against the republicans. This is similar to the concept of framing in behavoiral finance. There’s a difference of about 10 points between the two markets apparently. Another option is that intrade is for real money and newsfutures is for pretend money, hence the traders on intrade (who might be influenced by a greater sense of loss aversion) might be researching their points more than the folks on newsfutures who have nothing to lose except replenishable points, but the later point might not be necessarily true. The traders on newsfutures might be more accurately (and sunnily) predicting a democract victory becuase they aren’t encumbered by an intrade trader’s potential loss, it might very well be that having real money involved means that people evaluate their options more sceptically than a newsfuture trader who might be more willing to take faith in their own assumptions. I am assuming the democrats will win the house in 2006 and hopefully along with it political accountability, but I am willing to admit I’m not to sure on it (most of the republicans I know from last election are still republicans). The recent teenage chat-a-thon sex scandal is sure to mar the republicans, but who knows what will happen to the democrats. I might add I’d never read about question framing before, but am finding it interesting and obviously relevant to the issue at hand.

October 4, 2006 at 6:46 pm 1 comment

genocide theory

Let’s say you have a group of people widely believed to be genetically inferoir, but not actively bigoted against. Said people grow up and begin to succeed and form higher socio-economic classes etc. But the popular perception of them as flawed never goes away, hence the people in question begin to become comfortable with their country with out realizing how widepsread hatred of them is, due to the fact that people experience people personally not often as groups. People continue to go about their day treating everyone equally, so and so is one of the good ones they say etc. This means that so and so never experiences the behavoir assigned to their group.  Hence so and so and his or her race is given a false sense of security and is perhaps surprised when the people in their country deicde to do away with them, even though they have no experienced much if any bigotry up to this point, becuase the society they belong to continues to believe in the inferiority of their group, they become at risk and killed by a seemingly sudden surge in a previously covert racism.

October 4, 2006 at 6:23 pm Leave a comment

links for 2006-10-04

October 4, 2006 at 3:20 pm Leave a comment


October 2006
« Sep   Nov »

Posts by Month

Posts by Category